ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02804-2 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. He be awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM). 2. He be awarded the Korean Defense Service Medal (KDSM), and any other medal he may have earned while assigned to the 80th Tactical Fighter Squadron (TFS). ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 16 Feb 2012, the Board considered and denied a similar appeal. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s request and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit F (with Exhibits A through E). In an undated letter, the applicant submitted a request for reconsideration. The applicant contends he had more than 23 days boots on ground time in Korea. He deployed to Osan AFB, South Korea as part of an alert and did not have orders. He also provided a letter from a former airman who was stationed with him in Japan. The airman stated that he remembered the applicant deploying to Osan AB, Korea a few days after Christmas in 1968 and returned in Feb 1969. He deployed a second time in Apr 1969 and returned the last week of May 1969. In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a personal statement and a letter from a former airman supporting his claim. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit G. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: After again reviewing this application and the evidence provided in support of his appeal, it remains the opinion of the Board that the applicant has failed to sustain his burden of proof that he has been the victim of an error or injustice. The Board carefully considered the statement provided by the applicant’s neighbor at the time; however, the Board did not find the evidence sufficiently persuasive to award the KDSM or the AFEM. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 6 Jun 2012, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC- 2011-02804: Exhibit F. Record of Proceedings, dated 15 Jul 2011, w/atchs. Exhibit G. Applicant’s Submission, undated, w/atch. Panel Chair